选取库尔勒地震台2008—2015年记录的数字地震资料，与中国地震台网测定的体波震级进行对比，从震级大小、震中距、震源深度以及震中方位，分析二者之间的关系。结果可知，库尔勒地震台计算震级相对偏大，其中mb平均偏差为0.145 5，mB平均偏差为0.194 1；震源深度在0—96 km时，mb和mB震级偏差接近平均值；当震源深度h > 96 km时，测定震级和中国地震台网测定震级基本一致；地震发生在第三象限时，台站测定震级与中国地震台网测定震级基本一致。
The digital seismic data were selected from 2008 to 2015 at Korla Seismic Station, comparing with the magnitude of body wave measured by China Earthquake Networks, the relationship between the magnitude, epicenter distance, focal depth and epicenter location was analyzed. According to the analysis results, the average deviation of mb is 0.145 5 and the average deviation of mB is 0.194 1, which indicates that the magnitude of the station calculation is relatively large. When the depth of the seismic source is 0-96 km, the magnitude deviation of mb and mB is close to the average. When the depth of the seismic source is h > 96 km, the measured magnitude is basically the same as that measured by China Earthquake Networks. When the earthquake occurs in the third quadrant, the measured magnitude of the station is basically the same as that measured by China Earthquake Networks.
2019,40(2): 34-38 收稿日期：2018-03-30
DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2019.02.004
基金项目：中国地震局监测、预测、科研三结合课题（项目编号：CEA-JC/3JH-163105）
作者简介：李晓东(1978-),男,大学本科,工程师,主要从事地震监测工作。E-mail:kollxdxj@163.com
参考文献：
刘红桂. 不同构造区固有吸收衰减和散射衰减相对强弱的对比研究[J]. 国际地震动态,2012,(1):31-32.
刘瑞丰,陈运泰,Bormann P,等. 中国地震台网与美国地震台网测定震级的对比(I)——体波震级[J]. 地震学报,2005,27(6):583-587.
任克新,徐志国,刘瑞丰,等. IASPEI新标准体波震级分析研究[J]. 中国地震,2009,25(4):377-385.
殷翔,徐志国,任枭,等. 南京基准地震台与中国地震台网测定体波震级对比分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2012,33(2):21-26.
中国地震局. 地震及前兆数字观测技术规范. 地震观测(试行)[M]. 北京:地震出版社,2001:12-13.
中国地震局监测预报司. 地震参数——数字地震学在地震预测中的应用[M]. 北京:地震出版社,2003:10-11.
