烈度计台与测震台的布设环境、仪器类型不同，所测定的震级值存在一定差异。收集2017-2019年川滇地区301个烈度计台站记录的46次ML 3.0以上地震，进行震级校正。统计烈度计实测震级值与测震台网平均震级值的偏差，对原量规函数进行修正，进而做台站校正。综合修正后，利用量规函数和台站校正值重新计算烈度计震级，结果表明：在震中100 km范围内，烈度计测定震级偏差平均值由校正前的0.145降低至0.033，标准差由0.382降低至0.295，离散度减小；校正后的烈度计震级结果较优，说明本研究获得的量规函数和台站校正值更加适用于川滇地区烈度计台站的震级计算。
There are certain differences in the magnitudes measured by intensity meters and seismometers Ddue to the differences inof the construction environments and instrument types in intensity meter and seismometer, there are some differences in the magnitudes measured. The research data of 301 intensity meters recorded 46 ML ≥ 3.0 earthquakes recorded by 301 intensity meters and occurred cases with above magnitude ML 3.0 in Sichuan and Yunnan area within 2017-2019 were selected to carry outand magnitude correction were study. Based on Through the statisticsal of the deviations between the measured magnitudes measured of by intensity meters and the average magnitudes of the seismic network, and the original calibration function was modified and. Basis on the above, the station correction value was carried out. After comprehensive correction, the intensity meter magnitude was re-calculated by using the modified calibration function and the station correction value. The results show that, the mean value ofaverage magnitude deviations of that measured by the intensity meters within an epicentral distance of 100 km decreasesd from 0.145 to 0.033, and the standard deviation decreases from 0.382 to 0.295, which theshowing a reduced dispersion reduces. The result of corrected magnitude correction is better than before, and it is shownindicating that the modified calibration function and station calibration values obtained in this paper are more suitable for the magnitude calculation of for intensity meter stations in the Sichuan-Yunnan region.
2020,41(5): 1-9 收稿日期：2020-03-21
DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2020.05.001
基金项目：国家重点研发项目（项目编号：2018YFC1504003）；福建省地震局科技基金（项目编号：SF202005）
作者简介：林彬华(1988-),男,博士,工程师,主要从事数字地震资料处理与地震监测预警等工作。E-mail:lbhfzu@sina.com
参考文献：
陈培善,秦嘉政. 量规函数、台站方位、台基及不同测量方法对近震震级ML的影响[J]. 地震学报,1983,5(1):87-98.
陈运泰,刘瑞丰. 地震的震级[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2004,25(6):1-12.
金星,马强,李山有. 利用数字强震仪记录实时仿真地动位移[J]. 地震学报,2005,27(1):79-85.
康清清,顾勤平,于悦颖,等. 江苏及邻区地方性震级量规函数的研究[J]. 中国地震,2019,35(3):521-530.
李军,金星,郭阳. 福建台网测定台湾地震震级偏差研究[J]. 自然灾害学报,2016,25(3):143-152.
李善邦. 中国地震[M]. 北京:地震出版社,1981:120-156.
林仙坎. 闽台地区近震震级ML量规函数研究[J]. 中国地震,2006,22(3):287-293.
刘瑞丰,陈运泰,任枭,等. 震级的测定[M]. 北京:地震出版社,2015.
刘瑞丰,陈运泰,许绍燮,等. GB 17740-2017地震震级的规定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
刘瑞丰,陈运泰,王丽艳. 新的震级国家标准的技术要点与主要特点[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2018,39(1):1-11.
刘瑞丰,陈运泰,薛峰. 测定的震级之间不应相互换算[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2018,39(3):1-9.
王丽艳,刘瑞丰,杨辉. 全国分区地方性震级量规函数的研究[J]. 地震学报,2016,38(5):693-702.
赵明淳,毛国良,张从珍,等. 河北遥测台网速报震级偏差与量规函数关系的研究[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2005,26(5):87-94.
