选用广西数字化测震台网2008—2020年记录的广西及邻区1 251个ML ≥ 2.0地震事件震相资料，采用震级残差统计方法，获取广西51个地震台单台震级与台网平均震级的平均偏差和标准差，分析观测仪器类型、台基场地响应和震中距等因素对震级偏差的影响，进而提出台基校正值，修正区域量规函数。结果发现，南宁、天等、北海等15个地震台站的震级偏大，桂林、贺州、天峨等16个地震台站的震级偏小，崇左、灵山、平果等20个地震台站震级适中；在单台震级共14 784个样本中，震级偏差集中在-0.4—0.4，呈正态分布；震级偏差受台基场地响应和震中距因素影响明显，当场地响应值大于1.0时震级偏大，小于1.0时震级偏小，等于1.0时震级较为适合，当震中距在70 km范围内时单台震级偏小，当震中距在70—300 km时单台震级较为适合，当震中距在300—550 km时，单台震级稍有偏大。修正后的区域量规函数和台基校正值，可有效提高广西测震台网测定震级的准确性。
Based on the seismic data of 1 251 ML ≥ 2.0 earthquakes in Guangxi and adjacent areas recorded by the Guangxi Digital Seismic Network from 2008 to 2020, using the magnitude residual statistical method, the station magnitudes of 51 seismic stations and the average magnitudes of the network were obtained. The average and standard deviation of the magnitude deviations are analyzed. The influences of factors such as the instrument type, the site response of the station base, and the epicentral distance on the magnitude deviation are analyzed, and then the correction values for the stations are proposed to correct the regional calibration functions. The results showed that the magnitudes of 15 seismic stations, including NNS, TDX, and BHS, et al., were larger, 16 seismic stations, such as GUL, HZS, and TE, et al., were smaller, and 20 seismic stations, such as CZS, LNS and PGX, et al., were moderate; in a total of 14 784 samples of station magnitudes, the magnitude deviations are concentrated in -0.4—0.4, with a normal distribution; the magnitude deviations are significantly affected by the site response of the station base site and the epicentral distance. When the base site response value is greater than 1.0, the magnitude is larger. When it is less than 1.0, the magnitude is smaller. When it is equal to 1.0, the magnitude is suitable. When the epicentral distance is smaller than 70 km, the station magnitude is relatively small. When it is between 300 km and 550 km, the station magnitude is slightly larger. The revised regional calibration function and the base correction value can effectively improve the accuracy of the Guangxi Digital Seismic Network in determining the magnitude.
2022,43(2): 18-26 收稿日期：2021-11-1
DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2022.02.003
基金项目：广西壮族自治区地震局监测、预报、科研三结合课题（项目编号：GX202106）；广西烈度速报与预警软件科技创新团队科研项目；2021年度震情跟踪定向工作任务（项目编号：2021010111）
作者简介：牟剑英(1986-),工程师,主要从事地震监测和地震编目工作。E-mail:645335110@qq.com
参考文献：
陈贵美,胡文灼,刘军. 广东数字遥测地震台网台站震级偏差的研究[J]. 华南地震, 2010, 30 (Z1):113-121.
陈继锋,尹欣欣,董宗明. 甘肃地区近震震级的量规函数研究[J]. 中国地震, 2013, 29 (3):327-334.
黄瑞和,曾日祥. 广西地区震级量规函数 R(Δ) 修正和台基校正值[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 1989, 10 (6):10-14.
康清清,顾勤平,于悦颖,等. 江苏及邻区地方性震级量规函数的研究[J]. 中国地震, 2019, 35 (3):521-530.
梁向军,刘林飞,张玲,等. 山西地震台网速报震级与量规函数的研究[J]. 山西地震, 2008,(2):19-23.
刘瑞丰,陈运泰,许绍燮,等. GB 17740-2017 地震震级的规定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2017.
刘瑞丰,陈运泰,任枭,等. 震级的测定[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 2015:19-21.
龙政强,孙学军, 姚宏,等. 广西地区地震动衰减 Q 值和场地响应研究[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2014, 35 (5):6.
秦嘉政,阚荣举,刘祖荫. 不同地震仪器以及地震波的区域性衰减特征对测定 ML 的影响[J]. 地震研究, 1986,(1):13-25.
王丽艳,刘瑞丰,杨辉. 全国分区地方性震级量规函数的研究[J]. 地震学报, 2016, 38 (5):693-702
王亚玲,王宁,王莉婵,等. 河北测震台网单台震级偏差分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2020, 41 (4):26-37.
项月文,曾文敬,罗丽,等. 江西数字地震台网近震震级偏差与量规函数关系的研究[J]. 华南地震, 2010, 30 (3):95-104
薛志照. 近震震级 ML 量规函数和台站校正值[J]. 华北地震科学, 1992, 10 (1):60-65.
