西安地震台新建与原形变山洞引洞进深、覆盖层厚度、观测环境等存在差异,山洞内各架设一套DSQ型水管倾斜仪进行形变观测。选取2套仪器2020年观测数据,就数据完整率、固体潮波形记录、自然环境干扰、强远震同震响应、数据内在质量等进行对比分析。结果表明: ①与原形变山洞相比,新建山洞观测数据的稳定性、内在质量较优;②新建山洞架设的水管仪基本不受大风、降雨等自然环境干扰的影响; ③受人员参观影响,新形变山洞水管仪数据完整率、相对噪声水平略差; ④基线长度不同,可能是2套仪器记录强远震同震响应幅度不同的原因之一。总体上,随着新建形变山洞观测环境的逐渐稳定,其各项指标具有稳中向优的趋势。
There are differences in the depth, the thickness of the overburden, and the observation environment between the newly-built and the original deformation caves of Xi’an Seismic Station. A set of DSQ water-tube tiltmeter is deployed in each cave for deformation observation. The observation data of two sets of instruments in 2020 are selected for comparative analysis in the aspects of data integrity, solid tide waveform recording, natural environment interference, coseismic response of strong and distant earthquakes, internal quality of data, etc. The results show that: ① Compared with the observations in the original deformation cave, the stability and internal quality of the observation data in the new cave are better; ② The observations of the watertube tiltmeter deployed in the new cave were basically not affected by the interference of natural environment such as strong wind and rainfall; ③ Affected by the visits, the data integrity and relative noise level of the observations in the newly-built cave are slightly poor; ④ The different baseline length may be one of the reasons for the different coseismic response amplitudes recorded by the two sets of instruments. In general, with the gradual stabilization of the observation environment of the newly-built deformation cave, its indicators have a trend from stable to excellent.
2022,43(2): 121-127 收稿日期:2021-5-31
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2022.02.016
基金项目:陕西省地震局起航与创新基金(项目编号:QC202005)
作者简介:辛建村(1990-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事地震形变监测与分析工作。E-mail:970989479@qq.com
*通讯作者:闫俊义(1979-),男,本科,高级工程师,主要从事地震监测与数据分析处理工作。E-mail:543429931@qq.com
参考文献:
陈敏,郭欣,郑许东. 重庆台倾斜潮汐形变干扰异常与震兆异常的识别[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2007, 27(S1):79-83.
崔庆谷,杨星,杨跃文. 水管仪、垂直摆及水平摆高频段记录数据差异的对比[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2014, 34(4):175-178.
胡玮,石伟,贾昊东. 乌加河地震台水平摆、水管倾斜仪同震响应对比分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2017, 38(4):142-146.
金克俭. 地倾斜干扰因素的典型图像分类与说明[J]. 地壳形变与地震, 1986,(2):131-136.
吕琳,孙伶俐,蒋玲霞,等. 武汉及周边地区数字化形变观测资料质量分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2019, 40(2):97-102.
刘春国,李正媛,吕品姬,等. 数字化地震前兆台网观测数据质量评价方法[J]. 中国地震, 2017, 33(1):112-121
牛安福,张晶,高福旺,等. 地壳持续加速变形与地震关系的研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2002,(1):29-33.
武艳强,陈长云,季灵运,等. 基于形变资料开展地震预测研究需关注的问题及展望[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2018, 38(12):1 211-1 219.
袁曲,许裕之,吕品姬,等. 宜昌台三类地倾斜仪观测数据的对比研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2019, 41(6):1 536-1 544.
张雁滨,蒋骏,钱家栋,等. 地壳介质微形变异常与强震短临前兆[J]. 地震学报, 2002, 24(1):103-108.
周云耀,吴涛,温兴卫,等. DSQ 水管倾斜仪传递函数的实验比测[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2010, 30(Z2):99-101.
赵爱平,李传江,周红艳,等. 会昌地震台相同测点倾斜固体潮观测之对比分析[J]. 华南地震, 2012, 32(2):121-132.